The juxtaposition of the lofty “Knyghtes Tale” with the rude “Myllers Tale”.

The rationale for Chaucer’s The Canterbury Tales is competition. The pilgrims must compete in a story competition where the winner of the competition gets their dinner bought for them and the remaining participants provide their own. This sense of competition resonates within the tales themselves, where each tale offers its own particular perspective and comes with its own inherent judgements.

The Caunterbury Tales

*The Caunterbury Tales

In my study of The Canterbury Tales I found that this competition of perspectives was most pronounced in Chaucer’s juxtaposition of The Knyghtes Tale, a long romance tale with The Myllers Tale, essentially the rudest story of all the tales. The order of The Canterbury Tales is unfixed, except for the first two tales, The Knyghtes Tale and The Myllers Tale.

The Knyghtes Tale represents the high brow medieval literature circulating at the time and encompasses existential issues like chance and fate; while The Myllers Tale is a fabliau, that is to say a tale distinguished by its gritty realism and its black comical narrative. Chaucer doesn’t just simply give a romance and a rude story at the start of The Canterbury Tales (hereafter abbreviated to The Tales). By pairing The Myllers Tale immediately after The Knyghtes Tale Chaucer makes the genre of fabliau worthwhile by parodying the concerns that are expressed in The Knyghtes Tale, and in doing so, effectively provides the reader with two different perspectives in which to view the world.

The Knyghtes Tale is an intellectually ambitious narrative ruminating upon the big questions underlying human existence and vocalises humankind’s inquisitiveness concerning fate, destiny and the workings of God. Diametrically opposed to this existential viewpoint, The Myllers Tale undercuts these anxieties and depicts a world with no supernatural forces dictating who prospers and who fails. The world of The Myllers Tale is a world where an individual’s agency and wit (or lack) determine their fate and fortune.

As part of my MA my fellow classmates and I were given a tour of the Special Collections and Rare Books Reading Room within UCC’s Boole Library. During this tour the Archivist had laid out Geoffrey Chaucer’s The Works 1532: With Supplementary Material from the editions of 1542, 1561, 1598, and 1602. I was intrigued with the illustrations that accompanied the Knyghtes and the Myllers tales in this book as they visually conveyed this juxtaposition.

The knyghtes tale

*The knyghtes tale

This illustration represents a finely glad Knight upon his equally well dressed mount. This visually indicates both the Knight’s elevated social position amongst the other pilgrims and signifies that the story he will tell belongs to the upper echelons of medieval society.

The Myllers tale

*The Myllers tale

In contrast to the first illustration, the above image that introduces the Myller’s Tale is reflective of the Miller’s own lowly social rank. Here the Miller is depicted in less fine attire than the Knight, presumably wearing clothes that would’ve been worn by peasants. Similarly the Miller’s horse looks nothing like the Knight’s handsome steed, rather it resembles an old, inferior work horse whose only adornments are its bridle and saddle. I felt that this visual depiction of the Miller complemented Chaucer’s work, particularly in respect to the Miller’s rude interruption in which he jumps the queue in the story competition.

Examining these illustrations in relation to their corresponding stories served enhanced the value of their context. Their context – that is both tales being fixed and juxtaposed together – complete Chaucer’s world outlook where spiritual concerns govern the world of the Knyghtes Tale, and the catalyst underlying the world of the Myllers Tale is the sexual appetite of its characters. To conclude neither the Knyghtes or the Myllers would have had the same resonance without each other.

Works Cited

Chaucer, Geoffrey. The Works 1532: With Supplementary Material from the editions of 1542, 1561, 1598, and 1602. Yorkshire: Scholar Press, 1974. Print.

*The images included in this post are my own photographs taken of the above-mentioned source, with permission from Special Collections, Boole Library, University College Cork.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Borderlines XXI

Authority in the Medieval and Early Modern World

For the Wynn

by Kate Thomas, University of York, UK

Medieval Marginalia

Exploring Medieval Folklore, Literature and Archaeology.

phdchatucc

CACSSS PhD Informal Gathering

Selim28

Spanish Society for Medieval English Language and Literature

josullivan.org

James O'Sullivan M.Sc., M.A., Ph.D. | scholar, teacher, publisher, writer

Wellcome Collection Blog

The blog for the incurably curious

Windows & Wardrobes.

A trek through the world of children's films and literature.

Rebecca French

My peregrination from Ænglisc runes to 140 characters

wordplega

Old English Literature and Other Interests.

Marilyn's Meandering Mind

Historian- Freelance Aritist - Painter and Digital Artist

Digital Material

National University of Ireland, Galway. 21-22 May 2015.

Google Ancient Places

Finding Ancient Mediterranean Places in Literature

Languages, Myths and Finds

Exploring Norse and Viking heritage in communities around Britain and Ireland

The Long View

Texts in context

Joel Robison Photography

Patricia O Connor | Old English Literature and Digital Humanities Research Blog

%d bloggers like this: